Tagged With "Enveloping"

Topic

CSI/MHM adjustable envelope alarms

tcvib ·
All, I have been a CSI/Emerson user most of my career. Never really used autostat due to the complexity of it. I have recently started using SKF and find their envelope alarm editing very user friendly. I can pull what data I would like to build my alarm from and generate the alarm using the data I selected. I generally look back through my history and find a period of good operation and select 8 or 9 FFT to build my alarm from. Once the alarm is generated I go in and fine tune my alarms...
Reply

Re: CSI/MHM adjustable envelope alarms

Alvaro Loayza ·
Hello, I work with Emerson technology. You are right about overall alarms, you can set them manually in your trend. But if you want to check spectra alarms. Band alarms I think is the tool you would want to use. You have to set them manually. So the question is. Is there any way to get a bunch of "good" spectra (typical baseline start up measurements) to make an alarm limit set automatically? I'm sure you can make it for overall values and trying to find out how. But I haven't checked for...
Topic

TWA : gearbox

azizsuahid ·
Machine: Helical type Gearbox Location: 4 TWA H, 4 EN3 H, input nde Type: Single reduction 1480 / 349 cpm, TWA setting lor 3200/ end f. 2800cpm. Result pk pk 50g. Obvious modulation at input speed. Envelope ~40 gE pk-pk for two weeks Suggestion: to stop plant by mid june which is 4 weeks from now juz to replace the gearbox. I have a feeling to replace It by next week. But i am also facing downtime n production target. Thank you for reading and kindly comment...
Reply

Re: TWA : gearbox

John from PA ·
The rate at which the bursts occur would indicate that the most likely source is related to the 1480 RPM input shaft. If you have the equipment and the access to the machine I would suggest an examination of the input shaft area with a strobe light. Examine the coupling area carefully including the keyway. The speeds of 1480/349 could be obtained by a 106 x 25 tooth combination which is a hunting tooth combination. Depending on the accuracy of those numbers the tooth combination might be...
Reply

Re: TWA : gearbox

John from PA ·
Has that box ever been apart? And if so has anyone paid attention to the phase of assembly, of which there are 6 based on the 18 x 78 tooth combination? What is the past history of the problem? Something new or something that has been there for an extended period and is now getting worse?
Reply

Re: TWA : gearbox

azizsuahid ·
thanks i dont have that access. its a diffrnt type of coupling for a 2MW motor tooth 18/78. i simply put approx. actual speeds.
Reply

Re: TWA : gearbox

azizsuahid ·
1. Yes , many times, every 3 years, overhaul with new bearings and other things except the gears and housing. the gears have been for more than 10 years. no clear signs of wears. no oil analysis being carried out for years. 2. i am not aware the phase of assembly. i found your attached article regarding the phase which i will go through it 3. 3 weeks ago, there was a problem on the blower anchor bolt which we found it was a crack. we already fixed that by adding extra support. i 4. Readings...
Reply

Re: TWA : gearbox

Walt Strong ·
"Based on TWA, can one conclude by saying impacts on the bearings or gears are too high and danger. meaning to say, the gearbox might fail in one week. " I would be surprised if any knowledgeable person on this BB would agree with this statement! You are putting way too much trust in one SMALL piece of data! Walt
Reply

Re: TWA : gearbox

azizsuahid ·
noted and i will get more data
Reply

Re: TWA : gearbox

azizsuahid ·
gearbox tag 2141.1A was replaced last month with inner race + bsf faults today gearbox tag 2141.1B is under investigation. see attachment. thanks for thorough reading and kindly comment.
Reply

Re: Vibration motor(bearing)

Akhil Rathore ·
bearing numbers mentioned in post & in attached picture are different as BPFO is differs for both the mentioned brg nos
Reply

Re: Vibration motor(bearing)

Sin ·
Thank AKHIL RATHORE , I'll check it.
Topic

Vibration motor(bearing)

Sin ·
Hi all! Motor have: DE bearing: NU332 NDE bearing: NU330 - 6330 I use omnitrend (pruftechnik), it has bearings (attached files). I choose bearing true or false? Can you help me explain signature of attached files? Thank all^^
Topic

envelope band pass filter

aziz58 ·
hi dear all as u know some analyzer have ability to set various band pass filter and F max for envelope spectrum . what is best setting of them according machine speed and defects frequency ? I saw different suggestion .is there any standard ? best regards
Reply

Re: envelope band pass filter

Dave Reynolds ·
filter for envelope readings If you put the above search into the magnifying glass at the top of the page close to your name, it will search for your answer, lots of info on this subject in the boards Dave
Topic

300 Hz and harmonics at envelope spect. (DC Motor)

Onur Gün ·
I have never seen an envelope spectrum like that. At full wave rectified DC motors, we normally see 300 Hz peak but with harmonics at the envelope spectrum is not common for me. What can be the problem or are there any problem? NDE Envelope Spectrum NDE Velocity Spectrum NDE Accel. Spectrum DE Envelope Spectrum DE Velocity Spectrum DE Accel. Spectrum DE Envelope Spectrum
Topic

Envelope alarms/Severity Assessment and changing bearings

Costa Ilic ·
Hello to all, I believe some of you are in dilemma but I hope so meany of you are much more experience than I am. Making decision of changing bearing base on envelope alarms is not always the best approach but if all envelope filter are set up correctly and it is nice development of bearing fault frequency over life ob bearing what your you advice and do you have a reference to point out for correlation amplitude in envelope spectrum with level of fault in bearing. I am referring to regular...
Reply

Re: Envelope alarms/Severity Assessment and changing bearings

Costa Ilic ·
Thank you BECAR , Your answer is something that I expected, there is no simple and cross-platform rule. I was hoping that there is someone with more experience or knowledge from me or someone has some rule of thumb at least that have been proven in practice...
Reply

Re: Envelope alarms/Severity Assessment and changing bearings

Becar ·
There is such a variety of machine types that envelope standards will never be something to rely on. The only way is setting alarms for each individual machine seperately according history of measurement, experience etc.
Reply

Re: Envelope alarms/Severity Assessment and changing bearings

Rotating Guy ·
Hi, I am using enveloping for deeper analysis but sometimes it doesn't needed or i mean it is confusing, i do usually basic TWF and Spectrum and i can get the bearing fault, usually before i go replacement of bearing i check the amount of impacting if it get worsen. regards
Reply

Re: Envelope alarms/Severity Assessment and changing bearings

Costa Ilic ·
Hello to all, What we are referring here envelope analysis is something we use but not for making decisions in future, using it just as a tool of an early indication of a problem but most of the time we trust more TWF and Spectrum, interesting. Can we say envelope analysis is not so practical tool?
Topic

When to use filter 1, filter 2, filter 3 and filter 4 of the SKF acceleration enveloping (gE)?

jorgeluis-2000 ·
Good evening, I would be very grateful when I used filter 1, filter 2, filter 3 and filter 4 with the SKF acceleration enveloping (gE)? and what accelerometers to use in each of these filters to detect faults in the bearings?. SKF uses 4 filters: Filter 1 = 300 - 6 Kcpm Filter 2 = 3 K - 60 K pm Filter 3 = 30 K - 600 Kcpm Filter 4 = 300 K - 2.4 Mcpm As the failure progresses, is the filter changed or are these filters used only for early failures? and not to follow the progress of the...
Topic

RMS o Peak to Peak Acceleration Enveloping Alarm?

jorgeluis-2000 ·
Messrs. Forum: Good evening, I will greatly appreciate a query regarding the attached SKF (Acceleration Enveloping (gE) Alarm), there is confusion about it, in vita that literature has been found where it says that the values of Enveloping Severity in this table are Global Values (RMS) of gE and there are other literatures where it says that these values of Enveloping Severity of the table correspond to values Peak to Peak of gE. Please your technical support.
Reply

Re: RMS o Peak to Peak Acceleration Enveloping Alarm?

Becar ·
Very good question! I am not a big fan of the ˝table˝ envelope analysis (I don't use it) but I know this SKF enveloping alarm table and I know the confusion about it. Can you provide some source, where you have seen that the values in the table should be RMS values? As the table comes from SKF, I think you should accept the SKF literature only. But here is one thing that bothers me. Per my experience the values in the table should be closer to RMS than P-P. That is why I never used it for...
Reply

Re: RMS o Peak to Peak Acceleration Enveloping Alarm?

Akhil Rathore ·
Hi Can you attach the literature where the gE values are said to be in RMS. SKF table is in pk-pk. Thanks Akhil
Reply

Re: RMS o Peak to Peak Acceleration Enveloping Alarm?

DBTCMP ·
SKF gE is always measured in Peak to peak never rms and 1 average.
Reply

Re: RMS o Peak to Peak Acceleration Enveloping Alarm?

Rotating Guy ·
Hi, g is always at P-P, i used RMS for velocity spectrum. regards,
Reply

Re: RMS o Peak to Peak Acceleration Enveloping Alarm?

DBTCMP ·
Don’t know who claimed gE was measured in rms, that is just wrong. I work for a skf distributor and skf have always told us Peak to peak. Also remember only one average to be taken,
Reply

Re: RMS o Peak to Peak Acceleration Enveloping Alarm?

Akhil Rathore ·
That literature is still awaited...!!! Meanwhile you can see this Webinar recording..watch it till the end. http://hiresmedia.skf.com/camp...sentation_html5.html
Reply

Re: RMS o Peak to Peak Acceleration Enveloping Alarm?

jorgeluis-2000 ·
Good afternoon, attached an extract of a Thesis that I found on the Internet (in Spanish), in the Envelope spectrum says Ge peak to peak but in the spectrum note says global value 3,814 gE RMS and this has created confusion, it is assumed that the global value should I say 3,814 gE peak to peak or 3,814 gE RMS ?. I will appreciate your comments. Greetings.
×
×
×
×